The Mental Status Exam: What You Need to Know
Since the 1960s, various mental health and medical professionals have performed the Mental Status Exam (MSE) to assess for a variety of psychiatric and neurological conditions such as bipolar disease and Alzheimer’s disease. MSEs provide objective and subjective data about clients experiencing a milieu of cognitive, psychiatric, and neurological issues. Conducting an MSE aids in making an accurate diagnosis during critical situations such as new onset stroke symptoms or immediately following head trauma.
When a client’s psychological and mental state must be evaluated, conducting an MSE is often the first step in the assessment process. The MSE is often described as the psychological equivalent of a physical exam, as it evaluates a person’s mental state and behaviors, rather than only biological data. Clinicians use the MSE to evaluate various characteristics and psychosocial attributes through observation and conversations with the client, including physical appearance, speech patterns, mood, and coherence.
When to Conduct a Mental Status Exam
An MSE should be conducted in various clinical situations to assess a person’s psychological and cognitive functioning. They help clinicians assess a variety of mental illnesses and neurological conditions. They can be used to evaluate the status of a client’s chronic condition, such as schizophrenia, or assess for an new, acute illness such as a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Clients with attention deficit disorder (ADD), Alzheimer’s disease, bipolar disorder, neurocognitive impairment, intellectual disability, and personality disorders may also receive MSEs. These non-invasive exams can also assess changes following head trauma, such as after a motor vehicle accident
Here are key circumstances when it is appropriate to perform an MSE:
1. Initial Psychiatric Evaluation
- When to use: During the first meeting with a client seeking mental health care.
- Why: Establishes a baseline of mental functioning, helps diagnose mental health conditions, and provides a framework for future evaluations and treatment planning.
2. Change in Mental Status
- When to use: When there is a noticeable or reported change in behavior, mood, or cognitive abilities.
- Why: Sudden changes in mood, thought processes, or cognition could indicate a new or worsening mental health condition (e.g., onset of psychosis, delirium, or depression).
3. Monitoring Progress in Ongoing Treatment
- When to use: At regular intervals during treatment, particularly in mental health settings such as therapy, inpatient care, or outpatient follow-up appointments.
- Why: Allows clinicians to track the client’s response to interventions and medications while noting improvements or deteriorations in symptoms like mood, thought clarity, or behavior.
4. Emergency Situations
- When to use: In crisis or emergency settings, such as emergency rooms or psychiatric inpatient units, especially if the client presents with suicidal ideation, aggression, confusion, or erratic behavior.
- Why: An MSE can quickly assess the severity of symptoms (e.g., psychosis or suicidal thoughts) and determine immediate safety needs and interventions.
5. Neurological Concerns
- When to use: When there are concerns about neurological conditions affecting mental status, such as head trauma, stroke, dementia, or brain injury.
- Why: Cognitive and behavioral changes are common in neurological conditions, and an MSE can help distinguish between psychiatric and neurological causes.
6. Substance Abuse or Intoxication
- When to use: If a client is suspected of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol or experiencing withdrawal.
- Why: Substance use can profoundly affect cognition, mood, and perception. An MSE can help evaluate the impact of substances and guide necessary interventions.
7. Legal or Forensic Evaluation
- When to use: When a client is involved in legal proceedings, such as during competency evaluations or when mental health is relevant in criminal or civil cases.
- Why: An MSE helps assess the individual’s mental state regarding their legal responsibilities, decision-making capacity, and potential risk to themselves or others.
8. Assessment for Cognitive Decline
- When to use: For older adults or individuals presenting with memory problems, confusion, or signs of dementia.
- Why: The MSE helps evaluate cognitive functions like memory, orientation, and judgment, which are crucial in diagnosing conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia.
9. Pre-Employment or Occupational Assessments
- When to use: For jobs that require mental fitness evaluations, such as in law enforcement, military, or aviation.
- Why: The MSE ensures that individuals are mentally fit to perform duties where mental clarity and emotional stability are critical.
10. Assessing Risk for Self-Harm or Harm to Others
- When to use: If there is concern about a client’s risk of suicidal or violent behavior, or they present with threatening behavior or thoughts.
- Why: An MSE can uncover warning signs such as suicidal ideation, hallucinations, or paranoia, which require immediate intervention to ensure safety.
The MSE is an essential tool to use when concerned about a person’s mental or cognitive functioning. It provides valuable insights in a variety of settings, from routine mental health evaluations to emergencies, and should be employed whenever a clinician needs to assess psychological well-being, risk, or capacity for decision-making.
What are the Components of a Mental Status Exam?
Before conducting an MSE, evaluators should ensure clients are comfortable. By establishing trust and rapport before starting the exam, clients may be more cooperative and honest throughout the exam, leading to more accurate results.
The MSE typically covers the following areas:
Appearance
Observations about the individual’s physical appearance, including clothing, grooming, posture, and body language. This can provide clues about self-care and mental state.
Behavior
Details of how the person acts, including their level of eye contact, motor activity (e.g., agitation or sluggishness), and any unusual gestures or movements.
Motor activity
Motor activity identifies the client’s movements and characteristics, such as speed, gait stiffness, tremors, posture, inability to keep still, and involuntary movements.
Speech
An evaluation of speech patterns, including rate, volume, tone, and fluency. Slurred, rapid, or hesitant speech may indicate various mental health or neurological conditions.
Mood and affect
- Mood refers to the client’s self-reported emotional state, such as sadness, anxiety, or irritability.
- Affect is the clinician’s observation of the client’s emotional expression, including its appropriateness and range (e.g., flat, blunted, or overly expressive).
Thought process
This refers to the organization, coherence, and flow of thoughts. It can be linear, logical, goal-directed, disorganized, tangential, or fragmented.
Thought content
What the person is thinking about, including any delusions, hallucinations, obsessions, or harmful ideations (e.g., suicidal or homicidal thoughts).
Perception
This is assessed by asking clients what they hear, see, and experience. Examples include hallucinations (hearing or seeing things that are not there) or illusions (misinterpreting real stimuli).
Cognition
This covers orientation (awareness of time, place, and person), attention and concentration, memory (short-term and long-term), and general intellectual functioning.
Insight
Insight refers to the client’s awareness of their mental health condition or their understanding of the factors affecting their behavior.
Judgment
This assesses the individual’s ability to make sound decisions and understand the consequences of their actions.
MSEs are valuable because they provide a comprehensive and structured way for clinicians to assess a person’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. By evaluating various aspects such as appearance, mood, thought processes, and cognition, MSEs offer crucial insights into a client’s current mental state, helping to diagnose psychiatric conditions and differentiate between psychological and neurological issues. They are also instrumental in monitoring progress over time, guiding treatment decisions, and assessing immediate risks, such as suicidal ideation or psychosis. In both emergency and routine care, the MSE ensures that clinicians have a thorough understanding of the client’s mental health, enabling more personalized and effective interventions.
Elissa Singson, MSN, APRN, PHN, CPNP-AC is an infectious disease pediatric nurse practitioner, health writer, and mother of two. She writes content to empower healthcare professionals, patients, and families with health and medical knowledge. She also loves to share tips on work productivity and efficiency to prevent healthcare provider burnout.
References:
Post, R.M. (2023). Bipolar disorder in adults: Choosing maintenance therapy.. UpToDate. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/bipolar-disorder-in-adults-choosing-maintenance-treatment?search=treatment%20biopolar&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1%7E150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#H11464920
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. Available at: https://psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/DSM-5-TR/APA-DSM5TR-BipolarIandBipolarIIDisorders.pdf
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth edition, Text Revision (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.
Silva, K. (2018). Bipolar Disorder Type 1. SymptomMedia. 1-37.
Ramezani, T., Gholamzadeh, S., Torabizadeh, C., Sharif, F., & Ahmadzadeh, L. (2017). Challenges of Nurses’ Empowerment in the Management of Patient Aggression: A Qualitative Study. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 22(6), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_216_16
Burton, C. Z., Ryan, K. A., Kamali, M., Marshall, D. F., Harrington, G., McInnis, M. G., & Tso, I. F. (2018). Psychosis in bipolar disorder: Does it represent a more “severe” illness?. Bipolar disorders, 20(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12527
Altamura AC, Buoli M, Cesana BM, Fagiolini A, de Bartolomeis A, Maina G, et al. Psychotic versus non-psychotic bipolar disorder: socio-demographic and clinical profiles in an Italian nationwide study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019;53(8):772–81.
Azorin JM, Akiskal H, Hantouche E. The mood-instability hypothesis in the origin of mood-congruent versus mood-incongruent psychotic distinction in mania: validation in a French National Study of 1090 patients. J Affect Disord. 2006;96(3):215–23.
Explore Our Latest Posts
Stay up to date with expert insights, industry news, and practical tips through our regularly updated blog.